QUOTE ("brando")
If you are concerned about the reliability of this bike don't give it a second thought. I have a 1100 km's on my bike and it feels the same has the day that I purchased it. Now that isn't such a big deal, however, My brother recommended this bike to me and I just had some seat time on his. His Rubicon is a 2002 and has 14000 km's (8800 miles) and it has been driven by his son, who is nineteen and let me just say he doesn't baby this machine. He showed me some of the thing he does with the bike and lets just say he will not be getting my bike anytime soon.
Anyway, my brother told me that the quad is 100% original except for the tires. Only time in the shop was for oil changes (and that has only happened 4 times sense he had it.). And when I took it for a test drive it still felt tight, like a new bike. Amazine.
My buddy's Grizzly is an 2003 and it has 4000 km's on it. Had some fun when it was new with the diff loc and the IRS. However, now the machine is 4 years old and constant work on the ball joints and coolent system. Always get towed back to camp. He got tired of it and bought a new 700 Yamaha, but just wait in about 4 years or so.
The Rubicon do not have the features of the Grizzly, however, I go everywhere they go and have far less problems. Again, if you planning to keep your bike for a long time and you don't want to be spending lots of money on repairs, Honda is the only way to go. If you want features ( things like diff loc, IRS, EFI) than Grizzly, King Quad or Can Am are a better choices.
My opinion Go with the Rubicon. Its a great system.
Hey guys. I am buying an atv early next year, and I was leaning heavily toward the Rubicon, but after reading posts on this sight the last few days, I'm having second thoughts about it.
Are these machines really as troublesome as some of these posts make them out to be? Are the transmissions really that fragile?
It seems like almost everyone has had transmission failure of some kind, and it seems that electric problems are pretty common.
So, what I want to know is, what is the real deal with these machines? Did I just focus on the bad posts and not read many of the good posts?
Please help.
If you are concerned about the reliability of this bike don't give it a second thought. I have a 1100 km's on my bike and it feels the same has the day that I purchased it. Now that isn't such a big deal, however, My brother recommended this bike to me and I just had some seat time on his. His Rubicon is a 2002 and has 14000 km's (8800 miles) and it has been driven by his son, who is nineteen and let me just say he doesn't baby this machine. He showed me some of the thing he does with the bike and lets just say he will not be getting my bike anytime soon.
Anyway, my brother told me that the quad is 100% original except for the tires. Only time in the shop was for oil changes (and that has only happened 4 times sense he had it.). And when I took it for a test drive it still felt tight, like a new bike. Amazine.
My buddy's Grizzly is an 2003 and it has 4000 km's on it. Had some fun when it was new with the diff loc and the IRS. However, now the machine is 4 years old and constant work on the ball joints and coolent system. Always get towed back to camp. He got tired of it and bought a new 700 Yamaha, but just wait in about 4 years or so.
The Rubicon do not have the features of the Grizzly, however, I go everywhere they go and have far less problems. Again, if you planning to keep your bike for a long time and you don't want to be spending lots of money on repairs, Honda is the only way to go. If you want features ( things like diff loc, IRS, EFI) than Grizzly, King Quad or Can Am are a better choices.
My opinion Go with the Rubicon. Its a great system.