[Truegrit]

Its tough to say the Claws sure look good but you do no tsee a lot of them around to compare them. I hear they ride the smothest of the "pure mudders" and perform as good as any of them too. Well at least the triclaws. I think the claws run about $10 cheaper per tire than the zillas.

 

[Truegrit]

pics.

They come in 27" only.

 

[Truegrit]

As an owner of outlaws, I would't buy them again. They do very well at throwing debris up on to people riding behind you. (soryy guys). And They do make one heck of a roost in the mud, once you get them going. I think they take too much power to turn in the thick stuff. Of course that is why they are so good, because they bite at such a big section of the mud or ruts.

The ride doesn't bother me. They will beat you do death on the blacktop, but I am on on the to run to the end of my street and back to warm the motor up. They are not bad on the trails, but our trails are mostly soft anyway.

I would go Zillas all around or even 27 zillas on the front w/ triclaws on the back. I just don't like the looks of the biclaws.

 

[Truegrit]

Bearclaws are not much more aggresive than stock. If you ride mountains or trails mostly they will do good. But down here in the water and thick muck they are not the first choice. They will be an improvement over stocker's performance. They are mainly a dry or loose trail tires.

You can run 26 or 27 w/o a problem, if you stick mainly to the trails then go w/ 26s to get a bit of highth, but keeping the bike performance loss to a minimum.